COURIC PRESSES CANDIDATE ON CONFLICTING, CLUELESS IRAQ POSITIONS
CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric catches a lot of flak from media watchers and other news organizations for giving cupcake interviews with softball questions, but last night she proved she has what it takes when she challenged Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama over his shifting position on the Iraq troop surge.
In an interview shot in Amman, Jordan, Couric showed that she is one of the few members of the mainstream media who isn’t going to give Obama a free pass. When the Illinois senator tried to duck a question about his plan for a 16 month timed troop withdrawal, Couric fired back.
“You talk about a residual force remaining in Iraq, but you’ve been hesitant to really give a number… to people,” Couric asked. “You haven’t been specific, though some of your advisors have said it could be tens of thousands of troops. Why can’t you be more specific as to what you envision?”
Obama proceeded to do the one thing he learned during his two-and-a-half years in the Senate: filibuster. Couric asked again, and again, and again until — after the sixth question — Obama finally admitted that, while he opposes the troop surge, “there is no doubt that our troops helped to reduce violence. There’s no doubt.”
Couric tried to clarify, “given what you know now, you still wouldn’t support [the surge]… so I’m just trying to understand this.”
And Obama, realizing he screwed up, stalled again and then reaffirmed that he wouldn’t have voted for the surge.
The result is that speaking in hypotheticals and prancing around through the Middle East is great, but when it comes to our national security during a time of war, Obama is absolutely clueless.












