Comments on: Barrett wins debate… among Democrats

By: Matt

Matt — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:33:33 +0000

Adam -

You cannot be serious. Your boss’s client, Henry McMaster, came in at 24%. Considering the sample size, he is statisticly tied with Barrett.

Does this mean Democrats support the Henry McMaster dungeon rape case failure, a slam dunk case that even an L1 at Charleston School of Law could win?

Does this mean Democrats support the Henry McMaster pay-to-play policy for hiring his trial lobby supporters?

Does it mean Democrats support the Henry McMaster Craigslist publicity stunt?

Of course it doesn’t. This is just a blatant opportunity for you to attack an opponent of someone your employing firm gets money from. What a stupid post. Your readers deserve better.

By: Clayton

Clayton — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:37:40 +0000

I’ll have to be critical of the poll on this one.
If I remember right, Barret was at the top of the “R” list and both the Dems and Reps areas automatically filled the top person in the list – and there wasn’t the ability to leave them blank.
I’d guess more than half those votes were people who wouldn’t have picked a “R” and didn’t think it was worth wasting thinking time on to change the mark from Barrett to someone else who sucked.
Fact is, a bunch of Dems just don’t think the stupid Republican choices are even worth bothering to mark.
That would be different from all the Republicans who answered polls on the Democratic primary choices just to vote against Obama because of his race. But that’s Repugnantcans for you.

By: LStewart

LStewart — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:32:21 +0000

LAUGH. CAN WE SAY SPIN?

If you ask Dems “which of the five Republicans running for governor was most likely to get their vote” you are not giving them an option in their own party.

This is not a story.

By: steve

steve — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:44:34 +0000

Stimulus/bailouts weren’t discussed. This was a debate about the environment, and despite the poll, McMaster was the strongest Republican.