<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inglis sides with Dems against Wilson, Barrett a no-show</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2009/09/15/inglis-sides-with-democrats-against-wilson-barrett-a-no-show/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2009/09/15/inglis-sides-with-democrats-against-wilson-barrett-a-no-show/</link>
	<description>REINVENTING THE S.C. SCENE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:57:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Barrett bails on day job</title>
		<link>http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2009/09/15/inglis-sides-with-democrats-against-wilson-barrett-a-no-show/comment-page-2/#comment-471397</link>
		<dc:creator>Barrett bails on day job</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palmettoscoop.com/?p=11330#comment-471397</guid>
		<description>[...] And when his colleague Joe Wilson was censured by the House for shouting &#8220;you lie&#8221; at President Obama, Barrett was nowhere to be found. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And when his colleague Joe Wilson was censured by the House for shouting &#8220;you lie&#8221; at President Obama, Barrett was nowhere to be found. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilson holds fundraiser in heart of Inglis&#8217; district</title>
		<link>http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2009/09/15/inglis-sides-with-democrats-against-wilson-barrett-a-no-show/comment-page-2/#comment-467384</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilson holds fundraiser in heart of Inglis&#8217; district</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palmettoscoop.com/?p=11330#comment-467384</guid>
		<description>[...] fundraiser was undoubtedly a slight at Inglis, who was one of only seven House Republicans to vote to rebuke Wilson for calling President Barack Obama a liar during a joint session of Congress earlier this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fundraiser was undoubtedly a slight at Inglis, who was one of only seven House Republicans to vote to rebuke Wilson for calling President Barack Obama a liar during a joint session of Congress earlier this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: With friends like Barrett&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2009/09/15/inglis-sides-with-democrats-against-wilson-barrett-a-no-show/comment-page-2/#comment-467347</link>
		<dc:creator>With friends like Barrett&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palmettoscoop.com/?p=11330#comment-467347</guid>
		<description>[...] The problem is, Barrett hasn&#8217;t exactly been Wilson&#8217;s most faithful friend. In fact, when Wilson needed him most during a vote two weeks ago to rebuke the Congressman who yelled &#8220;you lie&#8221; at President Barack Obama, his &#8220;friend&#8221; was nowhere to be found. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The problem is, Barrett hasn&#8217;t exactly been Wilson&#8217;s most faithful friend. In fact, when Wilson needed him most during a vote two weeks ago to rebuke the Congressman who yelled &#8220;you lie&#8221; at President Barack Obama, his &#8220;friend&#8221; was nowhere to be found. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barrett bails on GOP effort to de-fund ACORN</title>
		<link>http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2009/09/15/inglis-sides-with-democrats-against-wilson-barrett-a-no-show/comment-page-2/#comment-466668</link>
		<dc:creator>Barrett bails on GOP effort to de-fund ACORN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palmettoscoop.com/?p=11330#comment-466668</guid>
		<description>[...] for governor and trying to raise his conservative credentials, missed such a key vote for the second time this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for governor and trying to raise his conservative credentials, missed such a key vote for the second time this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2009/09/15/inglis-sides-with-democrats-against-wilson-barrett-a-no-show/comment-page-2/#comment-466646</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palmettoscoop.com/?p=11330#comment-466646</guid>
		<description>Im amazed at all the southern whites who take pleasure in a congressman disrespecting a Black President of the US on national TV before a joint session of congress. Considering these same people are still fighting to keep a symbol of slavery and segregation flying prominantly on the state house grounds Im not surprised they still view black people as second class citizens not deserving of the same respect accorded a white president. I say this with a bit of authority because this is the first time in the history of our country where a congressman has been rebuked for publicly disrespecting a sitting president on the floor of congress. Now SC has two firsts in Congress. Thurmond holds the record for his famous filibuster against civil rights in the 60&#039;s and now Wilson calls the first Black President a liar on national tv before a joint session of congress.The Bush booing analogy falls flat its on face. They can&#039;t even prove the boos didn&#039;t come from members of the Republican Party and theres no comparison to shouting the president is a liar on national tv. These same people would want to organize a lynch party if a black congressman shouted You Lie to Ronald Reagan when he addressed Congress on Iran Contra. Imagine the national outcry if a black congressman shouted You Lie to Bush when he tried to convince a joint session of congress Saddam had weapons of mass destruction as a reason for invading Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im amazed at all the southern whites who take pleasure in a congressman disrespecting a Black President of the US on national TV before a joint session of congress. Considering these same people are still fighting to keep a symbol of slavery and segregation flying prominantly on the state house grounds Im not surprised they still view black people as second class citizens not deserving of the same respect accorded a white president. I say this with a bit of authority because this is the first time in the history of our country where a congressman has been rebuked for publicly disrespecting a sitting president on the floor of congress. Now SC has two firsts in Congress. Thurmond holds the record for his famous filibuster against civil rights in the 60&#8217;s and now Wilson calls the first Black President a liar on national tv before a joint session of congress.The Bush booing analogy falls flat its on face. They can&#8217;t even prove the boos didn&#8217;t come from members of the Republican Party and theres no comparison to shouting the president is a liar on national tv. These same people would want to organize a lynch party if a black congressman shouted You Lie to Ronald Reagan when he addressed Congress on Iran Contra. Imagine the national outcry if a black congressman shouted You Lie to Bush when he tried to convince a joint session of congress Saddam had weapons of mass destruction as a reason for invading Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Dobbs</title>
		<link>http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2009/09/15/inglis-sides-with-democrats-against-wilson-barrett-a-no-show/comment-page-2/#comment-466635</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Dobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palmettoscoop.com/?p=11330#comment-466635</guid>
		<description>Like most everyone, my faith and life experiences serve as the compass by which I set my course through life. For me, my experience as a husband, a father, a small business owner, and public servant all contribute to the decisions I make.  But no experience has been more fundamental in the decisions I make than my experience in the United States Armed Services.  I served for 3 years, from 1986 to 1989 in the U.S. Army Airborne, attaining the rank of SGT/E-5. 
 

Military training has its basis on a few core principles; Loyalty, Duty, Respect, Selfless Service, Honor, Integrity, and Courage.  The military instills these values in those of us who are lucky enough to serve, and we are beholden to represent that those values as we transition into civilian life.

Some would argue that Congressman Joe Wilson had a right to confront the President of the United States.  In the proper forum, I agree. However, in every military operation we are guided by rules of engagement; rules that help us define our mission, define when it is proper to act or react, and what amount of response is appropriate.  These rules protect the lives of our fellow soldiers, and the civilians we are bound by duty to protect.  Congressman Joe Wilson, who is a veteran, should have understood better the rules of engagement for the Presidential Address on Wednesday evening.  

There is no protocol, or excuse for heckling the President of the United States during a speech, no matter what political party that President is from. Voicing opposition at that moment, in that setting, was a violation of the rules of engagement and disrespectful towards the Office of the President of the United States.  On the field of battle, when someone violates the rules of engagement there are always consequences – many times mortal. Last Wednesday’s outburst, while not mortal in nature, did do damage. It set a standard of uncivil discourse as acceptable behavior. Behavior that is unbecoming of a veteran and a standing member of Congress. 

When Congressman Wilson shouted ‘You lie!’ at President Obama, he also showed a perverse disregard for another important tenet of military training: respect for your commanding officer.  Though the President is not in charge of any Member of Congress, the President is the Commander-in-Chief and the Office of the President is due respect.  In the military, even in disagreement, we are taught to show superior officers the proper respect during formal occasions.  The President of the United States is the Commander in Chief of all our countries proud armed forces.  That title alone, demands the proper respect that is supposed to be instilled through military training.  Either Congressman Wilson never learned or purposely chose to disregard his military training.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like most everyone, my faith and life experiences serve as the compass by which I set my course through life. For me, my experience as a husband, a father, a small business owner, and public servant all contribute to the decisions I make.  But no experience has been more fundamental in the decisions I make than my experience in the United States Armed Services.  I served for 3 years, from 1986 to 1989 in the U.S. Army Airborne, attaining the rank of SGT/E-5. </p>
<p>Military training has its basis on a few core principles; Loyalty, Duty, Respect, Selfless Service, Honor, Integrity, and Courage.  The military instills these values in those of us who are lucky enough to serve, and we are beholden to represent that those values as we transition into civilian life.</p>
<p>Some would argue that Congressman Joe Wilson had a right to confront the President of the United States.  In the proper forum, I agree. However, in every military operation we are guided by rules of engagement; rules that help us define our mission, define when it is proper to act or react, and what amount of response is appropriate.  These rules protect the lives of our fellow soldiers, and the civilians we are bound by duty to protect.  Congressman Joe Wilson, who is a veteran, should have understood better the rules of engagement for the Presidential Address on Wednesday evening.  </p>
<p>There is no protocol, or excuse for heckling the President of the United States during a speech, no matter what political party that President is from. Voicing opposition at that moment, in that setting, was a violation of the rules of engagement and disrespectful towards the Office of the President of the United States.  On the field of battle, when someone violates the rules of engagement there are always consequences – many times mortal. Last Wednesday’s outburst, while not mortal in nature, did do damage. It set a standard of uncivil discourse as acceptable behavior. Behavior that is unbecoming of a veteran and a standing member of Congress. </p>
<p>When Congressman Wilson shouted ‘You lie!’ at President Obama, he also showed a perverse disregard for another important tenet of military training: respect for your commanding officer.  Though the President is not in charge of any Member of Congress, the President is the Commander-in-Chief and the Office of the President is due respect.  In the military, even in disagreement, we are taught to show superior officers the proper respect during formal occasions.  The President of the United States is the Commander in Chief of all our countries proud armed forces.  That title alone, demands the proper respect that is supposed to be instilled through military training.  Either Congressman Wilson never learned or purposely chose to disregard his military training.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betty Daniels</title>
		<link>http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2009/09/15/inglis-sides-with-democrats-against-wilson-barrett-a-no-show/comment-page-2/#comment-466593</link>
		<dc:creator>Betty Daniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palmettoscoop.com/?p=11330#comment-466593</guid>
		<description>Brenda, I am so happy that I did not take that class that you are talking about.  I would hate for the government to ride my back for 8 more years.  I am happy that the DEMS have found a way around that.  Aren&#039;t you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brenda, I am so happy that I did not take that class that you are talking about.  I would hate for the government to ride my back for 8 more years.  I am happy that the DEMS have found a way around that.  Aren&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betty Daniels</title>
		<link>http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2009/09/15/inglis-sides-with-democrats-against-wilson-barrett-a-no-show/comment-page-2/#comment-466589</link>
		<dc:creator>Betty Daniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palmettoscoop.com/?p=11330#comment-466589</guid>
		<description>I am so sorry, the figure was wrong its $4 billion in interest that  we, the taxpayers, have earned from the banks who have Paid back their TARP investment: 
American Express: $3.34 billion 
Goldman Sachs: $10 billion 
Morgan Stanley: $10 billion 
Bank of New York Mellon: $3 billion 
U.S. Bancorp: $6.6 billion 
BB&amp;T: $3.13 billion 
JPMorgan Chase: $25 billion 
Capital One Financial: $3.13 billion 

For some reasons, they didn&#039;t like the red tape.  And Guess What?  Other companies are trying to pay back.  So who knows, the money allowed may not be needed after all.  Good news for the taxpayers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so sorry, the figure was wrong its $4 billion in interest that  we, the taxpayers, have earned from the banks who have Paid back their TARP investment:<br />
American Express: $3.34 billion<br />
Goldman Sachs: $10 billion<br />
Morgan Stanley: $10 billion<br />
Bank of New York Mellon: $3 billion<br />
U.S. Bancorp: $6.6 billion<br />
BB&amp;T: $3.13 billion<br />
JPMorgan Chase: $25 billion<br />
Capital One Financial: $3.13 billion </p>
<p>For some reasons, they didn&#8217;t like the red tape.  And Guess What?  Other companies are trying to pay back.  So who knows, the money allowed may not be needed after all.  Good news for the taxpayers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenda</title>
		<link>http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2009/09/15/inglis-sides-with-democrats-against-wilson-barrett-a-no-show/comment-page-2/#comment-466584</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palmettoscoop.com/?p=11330#comment-466584</guid>
		<description>To Betty Daniels,
I&#039;d like to know how Obama &quot;earned&quot; $4 million for us...and exactly where you think this $300 million TARP money will come from?
In economics I learned that the only way any government can &quot;have&quot; anything is by &quot;taking&quot; it from the people. Sure, it can print dollar bills, but that is not creating wealth. Only we, the people, we the taxpayers can &quot;earn&quot; or create wealth for our nation.
And that&#039;s a fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Betty Daniels,<br />
I&#8217;d like to know how Obama &#8220;earned&#8221; $4 million for us&#8230;and exactly where you think this $300 million TARP money will come from?<br />
In economics I learned that the only way any government can &#8220;have&#8221; anything is by &#8220;taking&#8221; it from the people. Sure, it can print dollar bills, but that is not creating wealth. Only we, the people, we the taxpayers can &#8220;earn&#8221; or create wealth for our nation.<br />
And that&#8217;s a fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betty Daniels</title>
		<link>http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2009/09/15/inglis-sides-with-democrats-against-wilson-barrett-a-no-show/comment-page-2/#comment-466568</link>
		<dc:creator>Betty Daniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palmettoscoop.com/?p=11330#comment-466568</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jethro, for the truth.   That&#039;s the only thing that will save us now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jethro, for the truth.   That&#8217;s the only thing that will save us now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
