<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s still raining perverts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2009/01/14/its-still-raining-perverts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2009/01/14/its-still-raining-perverts/</link>
	<description>REINVENTING THE S.C. SCENE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:46:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob W.</title>
		<link>http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2009/01/14/its-still-raining-perverts/comment-page-1/#comment-361683</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palmettoscoop.com/?p=5035#comment-361683</guid>
		<description>Actually, when it comes to collecting and analyzing data, I think I&#039;ll trust the trained researchers at Harvard over a &quot;get tough on crime&quot; hack who&#039;s trying to advance his political career.  Your &quot;proof&quot; that you left for Bob Z. was actually disagreeing with the study&#039;s final recommendation, not any of it&#039;s findings.

McMaster&#039;s entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.  If Republicans want to get back to being the party of thinking people, it&#039;s going to have to start listening to actual data instead of phrases like &quot;ask any law enforcement officer&quot; when making policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, when it comes to collecting and analyzing data, I think I&#8217;ll trust the trained researchers at Harvard over a &#8220;get tough on crime&#8221; hack who&#8217;s trying to advance his political career.  Your &#8220;proof&#8221; that you left for Bob Z. was actually disagreeing with the study&#8217;s final recommendation, not any of it&#8217;s findings.</p>
<p>McMaster&#8217;s entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.  If Republicans want to get back to being the party of thinking people, it&#8217;s going to have to start listening to actual data instead of phrases like &#8220;ask any law enforcement officer&#8221; when making policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill A</title>
		<link>http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2009/01/14/its-still-raining-perverts/comment-page-1/#comment-358987</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palmettoscoop.com/?p=5035#comment-358987</guid>
		<description>Uhhh so what happened to teaching your children the good sense to not talk about sex with random people that contact them on the internet?

Ohhhh, right.  That&#039;s hard.  Mommy government, please do it for me, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhhh so what happened to teaching your children the good sense to not talk about sex with random people that contact them on the internet?</p>
<p>Ohhhh, right.  That&#8217;s hard.  Mommy government, please do it for me, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Z</title>
		<link>http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2009/01/14/its-still-raining-perverts/comment-page-1/#comment-358931</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palmettoscoop.com/?p=5035#comment-358931</guid>
		<description>&quot;McMaster cited very convincing evidence produced by his Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force that illustrates a tremendous problem posed to children by predators seeking to engage them for sexual exploitation, or worse.&quot;

Why don&#039;t you say what the convincing evidence is? This article is poorly written and does nothing but confuse the reader. Is the study somehow flawed? Did McMaster not get the data he wanted/needed? Or is it just pouring perverts in SC, NC and CT?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;McMaster cited very convincing evidence produced by his Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force that illustrates a tremendous problem posed to children by predators seeking to engage them for sexual exploitation, or worse.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you say what the convincing evidence is? This article is poorly written and does nothing but confuse the reader. Is the study somehow flawed? Did McMaster not get the data he wanted/needed? Or is it just pouring perverts in SC, NC and CT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
