Comments on: It won’t be long

By: scgop

scgop — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:23:30 +0000

Well I will not believe another word until Lou or Liz comes clean. I want to see how Mcmaster AND Barrett ruined hisher life. Sounds like some body needs attention. Tell us Lou, or Liz.

By: lou or liz or whatever needs to go

lou or liz or whatever needs to go — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 04:21:09 +0000

Fogle,

Please quit allowing this “lou” person (who also posts as “liz” somtimes) to post comments. Their grammar is comparable to a 3rd grader’s and their intelligence is somewhere around functionally retarded. I know that you’re trying to be fair, but please just ban them for the good of your website.

By: Thelma

Thelma — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:43:59 +0000

Also about at least one of these gentlemen hurting you and your family beyond our wildest dreams. I would believe you on that too.

By: Thelma

Thelma — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:38:49 +0000

I will believe you, Lou. About McMaster having explaining to do, anyway.

Barrett looks too much like a kid in a candy store — a nubie that hasn’t yet reached ‘journeyman’ status.

Actually, so does Andre. Though, I have seen in the Columbia paper that he likes to walk and drive and fly a lot. So do I, but you people would rue the day I became governor/ boss of the purse strings. You would all eat Ramen noodles 6 days a week for dinner — meat on Sunday — and LIKE it.

McMaster looks like the 19th century corpse Folks is talking about in his story about Merrill not running. ( He pinged over to you, Adam. Won’t you ping him back?)

Looks aren’t always deceiving. Sometimes things are EXACTLY as they appear to be.

By: scgop

scgop — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:18:40 +0000

Lou: Tell us the story. Can’t wait to hear how both of them got together to screw you somehow. Why do they not have a bats chance of winning as you say. You think a big liberal like James Smith will win. You may want to rethink that one. Sorry for your loss, but please explain. You cant say no one believes you when you have not told us yet.

By: lou

lou — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:40:05 +0000

I do not think either of these men need to spend money to be Governor nor do they have a bat’s chance of winning.
Barrett has problems to face.
McMaster has explaining to do.
No one believes me yet but both of these gentlemen hurt me and my family beyond your wildest dreams and it’s gonna tumble out like a waterfall this year…….
We need HONEST POLITICIANS> are there any left?

By: Colonel Moultrie Says

Colonel Moultrie Says — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:24:11 +0000

Each would make a fine Governor, not quite sure anyone of them need a name tag… Barrett is needed in Washington more than SC so we see this coming down to Henry and Andre and either would beat Dem candidate like a red headed step-child…

By: scguy123

scguy123 — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:59:42 +0000

Commenting on – “Get on with it’

Why McFogle wants them to “Get on with it”:

1) McFogle recieves more money from McCrook (McMaster)
2) People will view TPS more often bc everyone knows hes McCrooks blogger-boy
3) He will have the chance to smear legit contenders who would do a much better job than McCrookr