RNC SMACKS OBAMA FOR ‘REDISTRIBUTIVE CHANGE’ STATEMENT
Dear Barack Obama: Keep the change.
Keep your “spread the wealth” plan. Keep your “redistributive change” agenda. Keep your socialist welfare policies. Americans don’t want it.
That’s the message the Republican National Party is banking on with a new web ad titled “Keep the Change” that takes the Democratic presidential nominee to task for a 2001 comment in which he said, “The Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society.”
The RNC coupled that remark with Obama’s now-infamous exchange with “Joe the Plumber” when he said, “when spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”
An announcer opines, “This isn’t hope. This isn’t fair. It’s a complete disregard for those who have invested hard work in achieving the American Dream.”
This is perhaps the most effective advertisement released in a while. Now if only they would run it on television, it would give a big boost to Republican John McCain.




From Neil Cavuto of Fox Business:
John McCain, I figured out today why you’re losing.
Your positions are always changing.
You voted for the $700 billion rescue package.
Yet today lumped your opponent with the Bush Administration for essentially pushing the same package.
Here’s the deal:
What’s the deal with the straight talk express? He voted for this rescue, but now says Barack Obama and the White House, who voted for the same rescue, apparently voted for something different.
Specifically, McCain wants to target the $700 billion into solving the mortgage crisis, not helping Wall Street banks.
Look, I wasn’t for this rescue, but I kind of knew what it was about…shoring up the banks. If Senator McCain didn’t know that, he shouldn’t have voted for that…maybe he should have read that. Because he is smarter than this, and the verbal gymnastics that rival anything John Kerry was ever for before he was against…way, way before this.
Not that Barack Obama’s positions are any more encouraging…but they are consistent. I don’t like the left-leaning, spread-the-wealth approach, but it’s a consistent approach and the Democratic nominee has never veered from it. You can accept him and his views or not.
With John McCain I’m not so sure. But I am sure I’m not the only one confused. …confused by a man who says he hates government spending, but supports pushing $300 billion to bail out folks behind on their mortgage.
You can’t say you’re against earmarks when you’re earmarking that kind of dough, Senator. Or adding more than $50 billion to a stimulus plan you cannot pay for…all the while blasting your opponent for coming up with programs he can’t pay for.
Frankly, neither of your numbers adds up. But I’ve come to see a consistent pattern in Obama’s. For the life of me, Senator Straight Talk, I see no such straight thing with yours.
Obama argues big government and spells out why we need it…accept it or reject it.
You rail against big government, yet continue to push cockamamie spending plans that make a mockery of it.
That’s why you’re losing right now, Senator McCain.
Not because you don’t have the courage of your convictions.
But because on economic matters you apparently don’t have convictions, period
There is an article on the web about how many Republican Presidents said ” redistribute the wealth” and won. It’s not communism, or marxism or even really socialism. Everyone is so scared of socialism and Bush is practicing it now.
Why didn’t people get scared of Bush’s bailout socialism and call a spade a spade??
[...] Obama a lot of grief over the last two years for basically being a tax-and-spend socialist (because he is), but I will admit that the symbolism of America electing a black commander-in-chief is pretty [...]
[...] to do this while running the Prairie State, I can’t wait to see what his pal from Chicago, Barack Obama, will do while running the free [...]