His blog is funny in very small doses, but mostly because he is a psychiatric case study. The disparity between his intelligence level and what he THINKS is his intelligent level is the most amusing feature of his blog.

He’s a half-intelligent, half-educated nitwit, and yet he thinks he has brilliance to burn.

You have no idea why some people may chose to remain anonymous, and your “outing” of them could have unforeseen consequences.

The blogosphere can be rough-and-tumble, yes. Deal with it in other ways rather than stooping to this. It is ridiculous and embarrasing.

Unlike most of your allies on the left, I put every comment through, regardless of whether or not I agree with it.

As for your claims in that post, it’s all nonsense. You’re just playing the “gay card” which has no merit in arguing against anything I have ever said about homosexuals.

I challenge you to find one instance where I said a truly derogatory thing about gays. Just one. Hell, I’ve probably said ten times worse about people in wheelchairs… and I am one.

The problem is, you and your buddy Waldo love to dish it out but when the subjects of your attacks fire back, you claim it’s out of some vendetta against gays, even when that has nothing to do with it.

If you and your boy really want to advance your “gay rights” cause, y’all would quit crying “gay” anytime anyone says a bad thing about someone who happens to be gay.

In other words, quit being sensitive, stop taking things so personally, and get a life.

And now we’ll see if, since I am certainly not an anonymous blogger, if you have the courage of your convictions and let this throuogh comment moderation.

In addition, your reasoning that ‘because’ some anonymous bloggers say libelous things, or launch baseless personal attacks, why don’t you make this seeminly pointless mission to out THOSE bloggers who use their anonymity for what you deem harmful purposes.

Otherwise your point seems to be very lost on me, and probably any other objective reader out there. This blog appears to be going down faster than Paris Hilton in the back of the Limp Biscut tour bus.

You attempt to “out” people because you disagree with them on political issues. Any strong writer will use logic and wit to win over readers. Creating a silly “witch hunt” only hurts you as a serious writer/blogger.

Use your site to “attack” a blogger’s poor writing with strongly written opinion pieces. One can use something called “logic” to make a solid point.

Name calling and implying one’s sexual orientation only hurts your credibility. In the end, a public writer should not be attacking people on race, religion or sexual orientation. It turns off readers and some may view it as disguised racism.