<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN is a joke</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2008/10/05/cnn-is-a-joke/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2008/10/05/cnn-is-a-joke/</link>
	<description>REINVENTING THE S.C. SCENE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:25:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: legend</title>
		<link>http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2008/10/05/cnn-is-a-joke/comment-page-1/#comment-219675</link>
		<dc:creator>legend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 01:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palmettoscoop.com/?p=3534#comment-219675</guid>
		<description>Someone pu nch stupidgrad in the face. That was the worst reasoning ever, &quot;if the other two that may have existed blah blah blah&quot;.  Your a fool. McFogle has this one right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone pu nch stupidgrad in the face. That was the worst reasoning ever, &#8220;if the other two that may have existed blah blah blah&#8221;.  Your a fool. McFogle has this one right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USCGRAD</title>
		<link>http://www.palmettoscoop.com/2008/10/05/cnn-is-a-joke/comment-page-1/#comment-219633</link>
		<dc:creator>USCGRAD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palmettoscoop.com/?p=3534#comment-219633</guid>
		<description>Based on your count Biden won by a 7.1% margin.  However you can&#039;s see everyone from the clip, so it could be larger.  I assume there were 30 participants.  By my count we can only see 28.  If the other two voted for Biden, he would have won by a 13.34% margin.  

   While I suppose one can debate the definition of significant, and while this was not a scientific poll by any measure, it happens to match up very well with the Rassmusen poll, which polled a much larger group, is scientific, and found an 8% margin for Biden in its poll on who won the debate.  

  Statisticians find these numbers significant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on your count Biden won by a 7.1% margin.  However you can&#8217;s see everyone from the clip, so it could be larger.  I assume there were 30 participants.  By my count we can only see 28.  If the other two voted for Biden, he would have won by a 13.34% margin.  </p>
<p>   While I suppose one can debate the definition of significant, and while this was not a scientific poll by any measure, it happens to match up very well with the Rassmusen poll, which polled a much larger group, is scientific, and found an 8% margin for Biden in its poll on who won the debate.  </p>
<p>  Statisticians find these numbers significant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
