South African rugby is going through a challenging period, with many fans and experts concerned about the state of the sport in the country. In recent times, two prominent figures in the rugby world, Rassie Erasmus and Nick Mallett, have engaged in a public debate about the state of South African rugby and the way forward.
Erasmus, the Director of Rugby at SA Rugby, took to Twitter to respond to comments made by Mallett on the popular rugby show, Final Whistle. During the show, Mallett criticized Erasmus’ performance as the Director of Rugby, suggesting that he wasn’t doing his job properly. In response, Erasmus defended his role and highlighted the various national programs he has put in place at SA Rugby.
One of the key issues that came up in the debate was the fast-tracking of elite black players. Erasmus pointed out that he was responsible for running a program called the ‘Fast Tracking of Elite Black Players’, which aimed to provide opportunities for players who hadn’t had the chance to play in Super Rugby or the URC. Erasmus stated that the program was fully sponsored and that he was proud of it.
Another important aspect of the debate was the state of coaching in South Africa. Erasmus argued that he didn’t have the authority to appoint coaches, but he did have a role in bringing them through. He pointed out that the players learn from a young age, from the EPD systems from U15, and some players learn better than others.
Mallett also criticized Erasmus for his handling of referees, suggesting that he wasn’t doing enough to ensure they were up to standard. Erasmus countered by saying that the Springboks were his top priority and that he would do anything to help them win. He also pointed out that the appointment of referees had to be approved by World Rugby and that he would welcome any help from Mallett in this area.
Overall, the debate between Rassie Erasmus and Nick Mallett has highlighted the challenges facing South African rugby. While the two figures have different perspectives on the state of the sport and the way forward, their public debate has brought important issues to the forefront. Whether it be the fast-tracking of elite black players or the state of coaching and refereeing, these are all critical topics that need to be addressed if South African rugby is to thrive again.
However, some experts believe that the public nature of the debate between Erasmus and Mallett is not productive. According to rugby journalist Mark Keohane, Erasmus’ Twitter rant in response to Mallett’s criticism was defensive and not productive. He suggests that instead of attacking each other on social media, the two figures should have sat down for a breakfast or workshop to discuss their views and come up with a solution.
The debate between Rassie Erasmus and Nick Mallett has shed light on the challenges facing South African rugby, but it has also highlighted the importance of having a healthy, constructive debate about the future of the sport. While it’s good to have different opinions, it’s crucial that they are expressed in a way that contributes to finding a solution, rather than detracting from it.
