Comments on: S.C. Democrats and viability

By: Ft. Hard Knox » Blog Honor Roll 11/03/07

Ft. Hard Knox » Blog Honor Roll 11/03/07 — Sat, 03 Nov 2007 17:19:04 +0000

[...] The Palmetto Scoop: S.C. Democrats and Viability (Apparently Stephen Colbert is not “Viable… [...]

By: Earl

Earl — Sat, 03 Nov 2007 15:20:28 +0000

As if the South Carolina Democratic Party has a clue about what is, or is not, political viability these days?

By: Gillon

Gillon — Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:57:25 +0000

I suppose “viability” is in the eyes of the beholder. In the case of the Republican party in SC it obviously
correlates to money, and thus exclusiveness. Why else would the filing fee for the Republican presidential primary be
$35,000 compared to the Democrats’ @2,500?

By: On Viability « FITSNews For Now

On Viability « FITSNews For Now — Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:48:44 +0000

[...] you haven’t read this column yet, you’re seriously missing out on one of the best blog posts we’ve read all [...]

By: PoliticalDerby.com: Home of the Original 2008 White House Power Rankings

PoliticalDerby.com: Home of the Original 2008 White House Power Rankings — Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:40:29 +0000

[...] Democratic Party denied Colbert a spot on their primary ballot. But why waste the virtual ink? Palmetto Scoop said best: VIABILITY, S.C. (TPS) – It’s rather humorous that the South Carolina Democratic Party [...]

By: Stephen Colbert denied ballot spot in South Carolina

Stephen Colbert denied ballot spot in South Carolina — Fri, 02 Nov 2007 03:10:53 +0000

[...] later post takes a few jabs at the SC Dems, who denied Colbert but allowed such “viable Democrats” on the ballot as Chris Dodd and Dennis Kucinich (who spells viability [...]