By The Editor | Tue, Jul 24, 2007 - 5:43 pm | Posted in Democrats, Primary Season

Obama S.C. flyer

The Palmetto Scoop has obtained a flyer (above) attacking presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) over the accusation that he “voted to give criminal sexual abusers early release from prison.” In the flyer, Obama is compared to former Mass. Gov. Michael Dukakis - who came under fire during his 1988 presidential run for his release of convicted murderer William Horton who later committed rape and assault - and claims that the Illinois Senator “is a threat to our safety and security.”

At the bottom of the leaflet is the statement “Mike Dukakis, Willie Horton, Barack Obama, wrong for South Carolina, wrong for America.”

The image was e-mailed to TPS by a reader who saw it posted in various locations across Charleston in advance of yesterday’s Democratic presidential debate. The reader said the campaign of Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) was behind the attack.

“This is what is wrong with politics,” the anonymous tipster said. “You can tell the Clinton campaign is running scared.

“They plaster Charleston with this idiotic flyer because they can’t beat Obama.”

Although Clinton’s people could possibly be responsible for circulating the material, TPS cannot confirm the originating source of the flyer or whether it is linked to any particular campaign

This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 24th, 2007 at 5:43 pm and is filed under Democrats, Primary Season. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

11 Comments

  1. July 24, 2007 @ 7:16 pm


    So let me gets this straight…

    A “reader” sends you flyer that they’ve seen all over town and somehow is able to glean from it that the Clinton campaign was behind it?

    Please tell me you’re either joking or lying about it being a “reader,” so that you can protect some super secret inside source?

    Absent inside information, how were they/you able to make the determination that the Clinton campaign was behind this? Why not Richardson’s campaign (who recently stepped up his campaign in S.C.)? Why not Edwards? Why not Biden, Gravel, Dodd, or any other Dem?

    Could it also be a Republican?

    Or perhaps, and most likely, it was just some random person in S.C. who has a computer to research Obama’s record and 2 dollars to make some copies to spread around town?

    How does fact checking factor in to being “the best” (as you say)? I’m just curious.

    Thanks,
    Angelo

    Posted by Angelo
  2. July 24, 2007 @ 11:28 pm


    What a joke. Oh, yeah, Dems are SO behind this. That’s why it comes across as blatantly Republican dirty tricks. Like a Democrat would ever reference Dukakis and Willie Horton.

    Was your brain removed at birth, or only after discovering politics?

    Posted by Newspaper Hack
  3. July 25, 2007 @ 8:10 am


    It’s almost endearing that the above two comments simply cannot fathom a Democrat playing dirty. Especially in light of the Clinton campaigns gross distortions of Obama’s comments in the debate just yesterday.

    Posted by ML
  4. July 25, 2007 @ 10:06 am


    Racist Flier Sent to Blogs, Perhaps South Carolinians…

    A tipster sends in this charming flier, which he says he was handed while in South Carolina for Monday’s Democratic Debate. Click to enlarge that sucker, you won’t be disappointed. This little broadside was apparently plastered all over Cha…

    Posted by Wonkette
  5. July 25, 2007 @ 11:21 am


    Hmmm… the lowcountry has seen a few alleged mailings and posters lofted over the transom to bloggers of late relating to races and events from Berkeley to Charleston County. Is this a sign of a tactic to come? I can see some mock outrage from passive aggressives on both sides that would prefer to goad on the “Let’s you and him fight” while stepping back and holding cloaks for the folks coming for the five o’clock stonings.

    I’ll grant that a Republican or a Dem or a convenient third party agent provacateur could have done this, though I’d love to know a few locations around Chucktown that I might find one of these billboards posted

    Posted by west_rhino
  6. July 25, 2007 @ 11:25 am


    In post script, it is an intersting quid pro quo to a “Black Chamber of Commerce” full page just shown to me from the Monday Post Courier hitting Hillary over her putative inconsistency on AIDS and HIV,

    Posted by west_rhino
  7. July 25, 2007 @ 11:47 am


    I’ve heard rumors Clinton’s SC goons were was behind this. Look for this to be proven soon

    Posted by rickybobby
  8. July 27, 2007 @ 4:20 am


    Help me figure this out. Hillary is a conservative racist who. . . . no, wait a minute — some of Hillary’s supporters are conservative racists. . . . OK, maybe one of Hillary’s supporters is a conservative racist who thinks the best way to support her in the S.C. Democratic Primary is to play the race card against Obama. That’ll get her votes, for sure. Does that make any sense to anybody out there? Would ANY Democratic candidate dredge up this old Lee Atwater dirty trick and risk using it against a fellow Democrat, even if they thought they could get away with it? Get real. If you’ll read comments about this incident on other blogs, you’ll find that it has made South Carolina a laughing stock, yet again, in the eyes of our fellow Americans. And no one outside of The Palmetto Poop, er Scoop, and its more rabid true believers thinks for a second that the Clinton campaign or that of any other Democratic candidate was behind this sick stunt.

    Posted by Bill
  9. January 7, 2008 @ 1:27 pm


    People like the Clintons who wrote the book on the politics of personal destruction and have raised it to an art form while denying it and decrying it are certainly capable of a stunt like this. The mock outrage of people like Angelo seems sort of silly in light of the undeniable realities of Clintonian political warfare. Sure it’s true that they may not have done this specific thing, but to act like they’re either not capable of it or wouldn’t stoop to it is to be either a hopeless dupe or a disingenuous political hack. O-Tim

    Posted by O-Timothy
  10. January 25, 2008 @ 1:51 am


    From Newsmax, interesting insight for us Christians.

    Barack Obama prays during services at Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago. Barack Obama’s longtime minister, mentor, and sounding board has been a key supporter of Louis Farrakhan and last month honored the Nation of Islam leader for lifetime achievement.

    Farrakhan has repeatedly made hate-filled statements targeting Jews, whites, America, and homosexuals. He has called whites “blue-eyed devils” and the “anti-Christ.” He has described Jews as “bloodsuckers” who control the government, the media, and some black organizations.

    “Do you know some of these satanic Jews have taken over BET [the Black Entertainment Network]?” Farrakhan said in a speech on Nov. 11, 2007. “Everything that we built, they have. The mind of Satan now is running the record industry, movie industry, and television. And they make us look like we’re the murderers; we look like we’re the gangsters, but we’re punk stuff.”

    The month after that speech, Obama’s minister and friend, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. and his Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, honored Farrakhan at a gala, bestowing on him its Rev. Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. Lifetime Achievement Trumpeteer award.

    Obama has said he found religion through Wright in the 1980s and consulted him before deciding to run for president. He prayed privately with Wright before announcing his candidacy last year.

    In the November/December issue of his church’s magazine, Trumpet, Wright heaped praise on Farrakhan, whom he helped in organizing the Million Man March in Washington in 1995. Wright lauded Farrakhan as one of the giants of the African-American religious experience in the 20th and 21st centuries.

    “When Minister Farrakhan speaks, black America listens,” Wright said. “His depth on analysis [sic] when it comes to the racial ills of this nation is astounding and eye-opening. He brings a perspective that is helpful and honest.”

    Hailing Farrakhan’s “integrity and honesty,” Wright said, “His love for Africa and African-American people has made him an unforgettable force, a catalyst for change, and a religious leader who is sincere about his faith and his purpose.”

    A video quoting some of Wright’s opprobriums ran at the gala at the Hyatt Regency Chicago and appears on YouTube. However, while the mainstream media have hammered Mitt Romney over his religion, they have ignored or else downplayed Obama’s ties to Wright. No stories have appeared on Wright’s award to Farrakhan in December.

    Wright’s church occupies a brick building at 400 West 95th Street near a public housing project and railroad tracks. Since becoming pastor in 1972, Wright has seen the church’s membership grow from 80 to more than 8,500. The church is the largest congregation in the United Church of Christ, a predominantly white denomination known for its liberal politics. Obama’s church runs an outreach program to attract gay and lesbian singles.

    Born in Hawaii, Obama is the son of a white Christian mother from Kansas and a Kenyan father who was a Muslim but was not religious. From age 6 to 10, Obama lived in Indonesia, where he went to a Catholic school. For a year, he went to a public school where he attended Islamic religion classes.

    Obama says he found religion and Jesus Christ through Wright, whom he met in the mid-1980s. Obama has been attending Wright’s church regularly since 1988. Wright warned Obama that getting involved with Trinity, with its radical reputation, might turn off other black clergy. But in 1991, Obama joined the church and walked down the aisle in a formal commitment of faith. Wright later married Obama and Michelle Robinson and baptized their two daughters.

    The title of Obama’s bestseller “The Audacity of Hope” comes from one of Wright’s sermons. Wright is one of the first people Obama thanked after his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004.

    For a Jan. 21, 2007 story in the Chicago Tribune, Obama said that Wright keeps his priorities straight and his moral compass calibrated.

    “What I value most about Pastor Wright is not his day-to-day political advice,” Obama told the paper. “He’s much more of a sounding board for me to make sure that I am speaking truthfully about what I believe is possible and that I’m not losing myself in some of the hype and hoopla and stress that’s involved in national politics.”

    However, Obama has said that in the fall of 2006, he broached the subject of a run for the presidency with Wright, who encouraged him to go ahead.

    As noted in a Jan. 7 Newsmax article, “Barack Obama’s Racist Church,” in sermons and interviews, Wright has equated Zionism with racism and has compared Israel with South Africa under its previous policy of apartheid. On the Sunday following 9/11, Wright characterized the terrorist attacks as a consequence of violent American policies. Four years later, Wright suggested that the attacks were retribution for America’s racism.

    “In the 21st century, white America got a wake-up call after 9/11/01,” Wright wrote in Trumpet. “White America and the Western world came to realize that people of color had not gone away, faded into the woodwork or just ‘disappeared’ as the Great White West kept on its merry way of ignoring black concerns.”

    In one of his sermons, Wright said to thumping applause, “Racism is how this country was founded and how this country is still run! …We [in the U.S.] believe in white supremacy and black inferiority and believe it more than we believe in God.”

    In an op-ed in the Philadelphia Tribune, Wright said that war is about “making the world safe” for American business interests. “When one goes against the war, one tampers with the financial institutions and the financial system that was put in place by the Founding Fathers of this country to keep the rich, rich!” he said. “The rich can only stay rich by keeping the poor, poor.”

    As for Israel, “The Israelis have illegally occupied Palestinian territories for over 40 years now,” Wright has said. “Divestment has now hit the table again as a strategy to wake the business community and wake up Americans concerning the injustice and the racism under which the Palestinians have lived because of Zionism.”

    Those views run parallel to Farrakhan’s, who said in an interview this month with FinalCall.com that there will be “no peace for Israel, because there can be no peace as long as that peace is based on lying, stealing, murder, and using God’s name to shield a wicked, unjust practice that is not in harmony with the will of God.”

    Just before Obama’s nationally televised campaign kickoff rally last Feb. 10, the candidate disinvited Wright from giving the public invocation. Wright explained: “When [Obama’s] enemies find out that in 1984 I went to Tripoli” to visit Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, “a lot of his Jewish support will dry up quicker than a snowball in hell.”

    According to Wright, Obama then told him, “’You can get kind of rough in the sermons, so what we’ve decided is that it’s best for you not to be out there in public.” Wright is retiring as senior pastor of the church in May. He asked his successor, Otis Moss III, to speak instead, but he declined. However, Obama and his family prayed privately with Wright just before the presidential announcement.

    The media blackout on Obama’s radical minister is in striking contrast to the coverage of Romney. Nearly half the references to Romney in the media include a discussion of his membership in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.

    If Romney’s church proclaimed on its Web site that it is “unashamedly white,” the media would pounce, and Romney’s presidential candidacy would be over. Yet that is what Obama’s church says on its web site — except in reverse.

    “We are a congregation which is unashamedly black and unapologetically Christian,” says the Trinity United Church of Christ’s Web site. “We are an African people and remain true to our native land, the mother continent, the cradle of civilization.”

    Moreover, the church has a “non-negotiable commitment to Africa,” according to its Web site, and the church and its pastor subscribe to what is called the Black Value System.

    While the Black Value System encourages commitment to God, education, and self-discipline, it refers to “our racist competitive society” and includes the disavowal of the pursuit of “middle-classness” and a pledge of allegiance to “all black leadership who espouse and embrace the Black Value System.” It defines “middle-classness” as a way for American society to “snare” blacks rather than “killing them off directly” or “placing them in concentration camps,” just as the country structures “an economic environment that induces captive youth to fill the jails and prisons.”

    In two exceptions to the media blackout, Tucker Carlson of MSNBC described Trinity as having a “racially exclusive theology” that “contradicts the basic tenets of Christianity.” Sean Hannity of Fox News confronted Wright on TV and asked how a black value system is any more acceptable than a white value system.

    If a white presidential candidate’s church had a similar statement and “you substitute the word black for white, there would be an outrage in this country,” Hannity said. “There would be cries of racism in this country.’”

    In response, Wright repeatedly asked Hannity how many books he had read by James Cone and others about black liberation theology. Cone, who is widely admired at Wright’s church, was quoted in the May 29, 2007, issue of The Christian Century as saying, “Theologically, Malcolm X was not far wrong when he called the white man ‘the devil.’… Any advice from whites to blacks on how to deal with white oppression is automatically under suspicion as a clever device to further enslavement.”

    On a few points, Obama has sought to distance himself from Wright’s teachings or to explain them away. While Wright is his pastor and friend, Obama has said, they do not see eye to eye on everything. Without addressing Wright’s denunciations of Israel and Zionism as racist, Obama has said he “strongly disagrees with any portrayal of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that advocates divestment from Israel or expresses anything less than strong support for Israel’s security.”

    As for Wright’s repeated comments blaming America for the 9/11 attacks, Obama has said it sounds as if the minister was trying to be “provocative.”

    But Obama’s close association with Wright over more than two decades and the minister’s close ties to Farrakhan cannot be explained away so cavalierly. If Obama rejects Wright’s warped view of this country, why does he continue to attend his church? If Obama disagrees with Farrakhan and his anti-Semitic and anti-white statements, why doesn’t he denounce him rather than continue to associate with a minister and friend who is one of his advocates and who gave him an award for lifetime achievement? Does Obama secretly agree with some of their hate-filled, radical statements while publicly avoiding race-specific appeals as part of his candidacy?

    That comports with Obama’s habit of not showing up for controversial votes or tackling tough policy issues, allowing him to broaden his appeal through charisma alone. Farrakhan himself recently spoke approvingly of Obama’s strategy, which is crucial to inviting whites to support him.

    “Barack Obama has been very careful not to position himself as Rev. Jesse Jackson or Rev. Al Sharpton as a promoter of ‘The Black Cause,’” Farrakhan said in the interview with FinalCall.com. “He has been groomed, wisely so, to be seen more as a unifier, rather than one who speaks only for the hurt of black people.”

    At the least, Obama’s membership in Wright’s church and close ties to Wright himself suggest a lack of judgment and an insensitivity to views that are repugnant to the vast majority of white Americans who are not bigots or anti-Semites.

    That same lack of judgment has shown up in Obama’s gaffes — threatening to invade Pakistan and offering prompt negotiations with anti-American despots. More frightening, Obama voted last August to give Osama bin Laden and other terrorists the same rights as Americans when it comes to intercepting their overseas calls in order to pick up clues needed to stop another attack.

    To evaluate what Obama’s ties to Wright mean, picture America’s reaction if President Bush’s minister, mentor, and moral compass had the views of Wright and was an admirer and supporter of Farrakhan.

    “He that lies down with dogs, shall rise up with fleas,” Benjamin Franklin said.

    Obama may be a gifted orator, but his choice of a friend and advisor suggests he is masquerading as a moderate. While the liberal media have already decided Obama will be our next president, Americans may have a different view when they consider what his ties to Wright tell us about the presidential candidate’s true opinions and character.

    Ronald Kessler is chief Washington correspondent of Newsmax.com. View his previous dispatches and have them sent to you free via e-mail. Go here now.

    Posted by Dean
  11. March 20, 2008 @ 11:15 am


    Al sharpton Jesse Jackson, There are done ,,, they have a double standard,,, when it come to whites and black,, there is racism in the United State, most of it is coming from the Black Americans,,,, How can Al Sharpton say, its ok for black to get imus fired,,, for the comments imus made, but Jeremiah Wright is ok thousands of excuses a double standard,, its time for Jesse and Al to get out of the lime light,,, Had respect for all sharpton,, until I seen him on Oreilly ,, Just like Obama,, I voted for Obama
    in California,, but now when it comes time for the presidency He does not have my vote,, On CNN And Msnbc, I seen alot of barack Obama supporter out there saying
    I Hilary is given the primary,,, with the super delegates,,, Obama supporter are going to Vote for McCain,,, there for OBama lost my Vote, in fact I will Vote for McCain,,
    If OBama wins the primary,,, because

    Barack Obama is a liar,,,

    To all
    Obama speech ,,,, Not sure if you caught Not only did Obama,,, Refuses to denounce him,, but even More,, He say in his own words,,,
    Barack Obama was in church when Jeremiah Wright,, was spewing Anti-American, Racist ism ,,,, Those were his own words,,, barack was there
    After going on keith Oberman ,Show obama said he would denounce that if he heard that language he would leave and not tolerate it , and denounce it
    After he went on MSNBC,, he went on FOX CNN ABC< all the news station saying he was never there,,, in his church when he said these things,,
    But Now today during his speech,,He states flat out Say’s HE was there,,, Last week Barack Obama Lied,, went on all the news stations, and Lied,,
    But your not reporting that,,,, You can rest assure,,, cnn ,,, Fox , ABC,,, Msnbc,, are getting more on this ,,, they will be reporting on this, and we will see
    If you chose to report, Obama Lying on tv,,, If this was Hilary clinton lying and caught lying on all the new station,,, you can be sure,, you would talk about it every hour
    people will be on your station debating this,,,, people analysing , if it is hilary clinton but it was not her it was Barack Obama, ,, it bad enought He lied, about being in church
    With Jeremiah Write, when he said these anti american ,,,,,and still refuse to denounce him…all the news agency want to do is speak on how good his speech was,
    Not that he lied,,, Last week on all the news agency ,, He was never there today in how own speech He say I was there,,,,should play all Obama videos from last week
    stating he was not there,,, or heard any of the anti-american Jeremiah Write, said in his churc then play his speech today saying he was there and he did hear him in church and refuse to denounce Jeremiah Wright..

    Posted by Paul V

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.